MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973611437 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m005256200

Trans Complementation of Variant Cre Proteins for Defects in Cleavage and Synapsis

2000· article· en· W1973611437 on OpenAlexaff
Arshad Shaikh, Paul D. Sadowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynapsisSite-specific recombinationCre recombinaseRecombinaseCleavage (geology)BiologyGeneticsChemistryRecombinationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cre recombinase is a member of the integrase family of conservative site-specific recombinases. These proteins share five conserved catalytic residues, one of which is a tyrosine that acts as the nucleophile to attack the scissile phosphodiester bond in the DNA target. Recombination by the Cre recombinase takes place in a supramolecular structure called a synapse that consists of four molecules of Cre bound to two DNA target sequences called lox sites. The synapse is held together by an intricate network of protein-protein interactions. They bend the two sites into square planar structure that resembles a Holliday intermediate. We have studied three mutant Cre proteins that appear to have defects in synapsis (Cre A36V, Cre T41F, and Cre G314R). We found that they were unable to carry out strand cleavage but that cleavage occurred if they were mixed with a cleavage-defective Cre protein that lacks the catalytic nucleophilic tyrosine residue. The three variant proteins could also be complemented for the formation of a novel structure ("complexV"), which may be a cleaved synaptic intermediate. We suggest that these three mutant proteins have a defect in DNA bending and discuss the relationship between bending, synapsis, and cleavage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207