MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973619683 · doi:10.1093/notesj/gjp032

John Cleveland in Joshua Poole's English Parnassus (1657)

2009· article· en· W1973619683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes and Queries · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryPopularitySign (mathematics)LiteratureHistorySpanish Civil WarArtLine (geometry)ClassicsLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IN his day John Cleveland (1613–1658) was hailed as a ‘Notable Highsoaring Witty Loyalist of Cambridge, whose Verses in the time of the Civil War’ were ‘in great request’.1 From 1647 to 1700 his poems went through twenty-five editions, a sign of his popularity and of the attractiveness of his strong lines and his cutting satire. Another indication of his fame was his inclusion in Poole's Parnassus, and if nine entries seem but a small number, there were many contemporary poets who fared worse.2 The following list gives, on the left side, the page and line numbers in Parnassus first, then the title of the poem with the page and line numbers in the edition of Morris and Withington (see footnote 1); then, on the right side, the quotations from each of these two sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it