MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973633247 · doi:10.1353/esc.2010.0033

Branching Out : Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’s Writing

2010· article· en· W1973633247 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Tessa Jordan

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPoliticsMainstreamGender studiesFeminismSociologyHistoryLawMedia studiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Branching Out: Second-Wave Feminist Periodicals and the Archive of Canadian Women’s Writing Tessa Jordan (bio) Look, I push feminist articles as much as I can ... I’ve got a certain kind of magazine. It’s not Ms. It’s not Branching Out. It’s not Status of Women News. Doris Anderson Rough Layout When Edmonton-based Branching Out: Canadian Magazine for Women (1973 to 1980) began its thirty-one-issue, seven-year history, Doris Anderson was the most prominent figure in women’s magazine publishing in Canada. Indeed, her work as a journalist, editor, novelist, and women’s rights activist made Anderson one of the most well-known faces of the Canadian women’s movement. She chaired the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women from 1979 to 1981 and was the president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women from 1982 to 1984, but she is best known as the long-time editor of Chatelaine, Canada’s longest lived mainstream women’s magazine, which celebrated its eightieth anniversary in 2008. As Chatelaine’s editor from 1957 to 1977, she was at the forefront of the Canadian women’s movement, publishing articles and editorials on a wide range of feminist issues, including legalizing abortion, birth control, divorce laws, violence against women, and [End Page 63] women in politics. When Anderson passed away in 2007, then Governor-General Adrienne Clarkson declared that “Doris was terribly important as a second-wave feminist because she had the magazine for women and it was always thoughtful and always had interesting things in it” (quoted in Martin). Anderson used a mainstream women’s magazine as a vehicle for feminist advocacy, working within the Maclean Hunter publishing empire to bring feminist content to mainstream readers. Chatelaine’s often-overlooked feminist past has been analyzed by Valerie Korinek in Roughing It in the Suburbs: Reading Chatelaine Magazine in the Fifties and Sixties, published in 2000. Korinek’s study “demonstrates the gendered tensions at work in the often idealized suburban consumer society and restores Chatelaine’s role in the growth of second-wave feminism in Canada” (23). Roughing It in the Suburbs expands our understanding of an iconic Canadian magazine and of second-wave feminism. While it is not surprising that the first book-length academic study to address the connection between Canadian feminism and the periodical press is a study of Chatelaine—because of Chatelaine’s accessibility and continued prominence among Canada’s magazines—Chatelaine is only a small part of the story of the intersection between feminism and periodical publishing in Canada. Chatelaine may have been “the magazine for women” in Canada during Anderson’s tenure, but it was not radical enough for many Canadian feminists. Beginning in the late-1960s, first dozens and then hundreds of explicitly feminist periodicals were being published across Canada. Better-known titles include Tessera, Room of One’s Own (now Room), Fireweed, Broadside, Kinesis, Herizons, and Status of Women News, while lesser-known but more radical titles include The Pedestal, The Other Woman, Prairie Woman, The New Feminist, The Northern Woman, On Our Way, and Webspinner. In what follows, I provide a short cultural history of the lesser-known but only national feminist magazine published in Canada in the 1970s, Branching Out: Canadian Magazine for Women. I draw on book history, archival research, and interviews with Branching Out participants to tell Branching Out ’s story and locate this remarkable magazine within the Canadian 1970s and 1980s women-in-print movement, which was part of the international women-in-print movement that began in the 1960s with the rise of second-wave feminism and paralleled other forms of alternative publishing. During this period, increasing numbers of women began to establish feminist presses, publishing houses, periodicals, and bookstores as ways of countering women’s exploitation in the mainstream media and [End Page 64] as a reflection of the common belief, despite ideological differences among feminists, in the power of the printed word. Publishing Canadian women’s visual art and literature alongside overtly political articles, Branching Out sought to bring the work being done by Canadian women from the margins into the centre by producing a general...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207