MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973648521 · doi:10.1002/pssa.201026093

Microstructure characterization of high‐purity aluminum processed by dynamic severe plastic deformation

2010· article· en· W1973648521 on OpenAlexaff
G. Dirras, Thierry Chauveau, A. Abdul-Latif, Salah Ramtani, Q.H. Bui

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (a) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMicrostructureTexture (cosmology)CrystalliteMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyDislocationDeformation (meteorology)Characterization (materials science)Severe plastic deformationAluminiumGrain sizeCrystallographyComposite materialMetallurgyChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fine‐grained aluminum (700–1000 nm) was processed by dynamic severe plastic deformation of coarse‐grained (3 mm) pure aluminum (99.999 wt.%). The resulting microstructure was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X‐ray profile analyses. It is observed that the grain size determined by TEM departs from measurements made by X‐ray profile analysis. In the latter case, the average crystallite size determined over the global crystallographic or on the deformation‐induced texture components, namely {123} 〈 751 〉, {100} 〈 011〉, and {223} 〈 154 〉, yields similar values (∼225 nm). By contrast, the dislocation density determined on these texture components is about two times higher than the one measured on the global texture. The difference might be related to the specificities of the induced crystallographic texture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (a)Same topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207