A Test of the Integration of the Response Styles and Social Support Theories of Depression in Third and Seventh Grade Children
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of the current study was to test the integration of the response styles and social support theories of depression in third and seventh grade children. Two hundred and sixty children completed measures assessing response styles (e.g., rumination, distraction, and problem-solving), social support, and depressive symptoms. In line with the response styles theory, third and seventh graders who exhibited a ruminative response style reported higher levels of depressive symptoms than those who did not exhibit such a style. In addition, seventh graders who exhibited a tendency to engage in either distractive or problem-solving responses to depressed mood reported lower levels of depressive symptoms than seventh graders who did not exhibit such tendencies. Last, in line with hypotheses, in seventh graders, (a) the relationship between rumination and depressive symptoms was partially mediated by social support and (b) the relationship between low social support and depressive symptoms was partially mediated by rumination. In contrast to the theory, however, neither distraction nor problem-solving was related to depressive symptoms in third grade children. In addition, contrary to hypotheses, in third graders, (a) the relationship between rumination and depressive symptoms was not mediated by social support and (b) the relationship between low social support and depressive symptoms was not mediated by rumination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it