MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973659347 · doi:10.1364/oe.21.010314

Time-domain holograms for generation and processing of temporal complex information by intensity-only modulation processes

2013· article· en· W1973659347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsHolographyComputer scienceIntensity modulationModulation (music)Quadrature amplitude modulationPhase modulationTime domainIntensity (physics)Signal processingPhysicsTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhase noiseDecoding methodsComputer visionAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time-domain counterpart of traditional spatial holography is formalized and experimentally demonstrated. This concept involves the recording, generation and/or processing of complex (amplitude and phase) optical time-domain signals using intensity-only temporal detection and/or modulation optical devices. The resulting procedures greatly simplify present approaches aimed to similar generation and processing tasks. As a proof-of-concept, we successfully demonstrate a time-domain computer holography scheme. This scheme is used for experimental generation of user-defined complex optical temporal signals, in particular, a sequence of arbitrarily chirped Gaussian-like optical pulses and complex-modulation (16-QAM) optical telecommunication data streams, by CW-light intensity-only modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it