MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973662389 · doi:10.7202/018496ar

Les représentations sociales de l’engagement parental du beau-père en famille recomposée

2008· article· fr· W1973662389 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Claudine Parent, Madeleine Beaudry, Marie‐Christine Saint‐Jacques, Daniel Turcotte, Caroline Robitaille, Marie Boutin, Catherine Turbide

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude portant sur les représentations sociales de l’engagement parental du beau-père (parent autre que le père biologique ou adoptif des enfants de sa conjointe) chez différents membres de familles recomposées : huit mères, douze beaux-pères et neuf pères. L’étude vise à comprendre comment les adultes dans ces familles conçoivent le rôle des beaux-pères auprès des enfants et à approfondir les dimensions de l’engagement parental des beaux-pères. Les résultats montrent que certaines conceptions du rôle semblent davantage partagées par les parents alors que d’autres semblent plus spécifiques aux beaux-pères.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances Familles GénérationsSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207