Aménagement linguistique, éducation et cohésion sociale en contexte multiculturel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le débat sur la langue française au Québec demeure un sujet d’actualité. En effet, la question linguistique occupe toujours une place prépondérante dans les esprits du peuple québécois. La promulgation en octobre 2010 de la loi 115 relative aux écoles passerelles à la suite du jugement de la Cour suprême du 22 octobre 2009 a réactivé le débat sur la question linguistique. Notre propos souligne dans un premier temps les difficultés que rencontre l’État au Canada et au Québec quand il intervient en matière de législation linguistique. Nous abordons ensuite les antécédents de la loi 115 et les modifications qu’elle apporte. Finalement, nous analysons ses enjeux dans le cadre de l’éducation et de l’identité québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it