MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973702036 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2014.6848518

A 330 µW, G<inf>m</inf>-boosted VCO with −205 dB FoM<inf>T</inf> and 35 % tuning range using class-b biasing

2014· article· en· W1973702036 on OpenAlexaff
Pawan Agarwal, Joe Baylon, Suman P. Sah, Deyasini Majumdar, Deukhyoun Heo, Christian Schlegel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatordBcFigure of meritPhase noisePower consumptionElectrical engineeringCMOSPhysicsOffset (computer science)Parasitic extractionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)VoltageOptoelectronicsPower (physics)ChemistryComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an ultra-low power VCO with a supply voltage of 0.5 V. The proposed VCO uses class-B biasing with optimum switching amplitude for the tail current sources to improve the phase noise. Using a G <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</inf> -boosted structure, the parasitics at the LC-tank have been reduced, thus resulting in a larger tuning range. Using the proposed technique, a phase noise improvement of 2.8 dB at 50 KHz offset and 2.2 dB at 1 MHz offset were achieved. The proposed design was implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process. The VCO achieves a tuning range of > 1 GHz with nominal power consumption of 330 µW, the lowest among VCOs with comparable performance. The proposed VCO achieves an excellent figure-of-merit with a tuning range (FoM <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">T</inf> ) of −205.4 dBc/Hz at 2.41 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207