Paleoenvironmental analysis of the late Neoproterozoic Mistaken Point and Trepassey formations, southeastern Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mistaken Point and Trepassey formations (Conception and St. John's groups, respectively) comprise a terminal Neoproterozoic, deep-marine succession of fine-grained turbidites and volcanogenic deposits that are part of the Avalonian Terrane. Debris-flow beds, slumped units, the low dispersion of turbidity-current paleoflow directions, and the absence of wave-generated structures together indicate that the sediment was deposited on a deep-water, southeast- facing slope. Channels were not present in the study area. The upward increase in the abundance of slump structures suggests that these units represent toe-of-slope and mid-slope environments, respectively. These units prograded over basin-floor deposits of the Drook and Briscal formations, which have (axial) paleocurrent directions that are orthogonal to the inferred downslope flow that characterized the overlying deposits. Within the Mistaken Point and Trepassey formations, a diverse assemblage of soft-bodied, non-phototrophic Ediacaran organisms is preserved beneath volcanic ash layers on more than one hundred surfaces. Individual fossiliferous surfaces can be correlated up to several kilometres. The felling orientations of frondose fossils indicate that contour currents, as well as up- and downslope currents of tidal and (or) wind-forced origin, influenced the sea floor in the intervals between event beds when the organisms lived. The contour currents may have been responsible for sustaining the organisms in this deep-water setting. The current-produced inclination of the frondose organisms at the time of ash deposition allowed their preservation by preventing the accumulation of ash beneath them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".