MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973721164 · doi:10.1143/jjap.41.1131

Ultrahigh Performance Staggered Lineup (“Type-II”) InP/GaAsSb/InP NpN Double Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors

2002· article· en· W1973721164 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBipolar junction transistorOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceHeterojunction bipolar transistorHeterojunctionTransistorVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the performance of staggered lineup NpN InP/GaAsSb/InP abrupt double heterojunction bipolar transistors (DHBTs) intended for ultrahigh speed applications. With a peak fT of 305 GHz (and fMAX=300 GHz), InP/GaAsSb/InP DHBTs are currently the fastest bipolar transistors ever implemented, and as such may challenge sub-100 nm gate InP HEMTs for > 40 Gb/s applications: previously published criteria suggest current device performance should be suitable for 80–100 Gb/s OEICs. InP/GaAsSb/InP DHBTs feature high breakdown voltages and low offset and knee voltages, and extremely high current drive levels enabled by the lack of collector current blocking at the staggered base/collector junction. InP/GaAsSb/InP DHBTs also feature important manufacturability advantages because the structure is entirely made up of uniform composition binary and ternary alloy layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it