Identification of Internal Autoproteolytic Cleavage Sites within the Prosegments of Recombinant Procathepsin B and Procathepsin S
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The steps involved in the maturation of proenzymes belonging to the papain family of cysteine proteases have been difficult to characterize. Intermolecular processing at or near the pro/mature junction, due either to the catalytic activity of active enzyme or to exogeneous proteases, has been well documented for this family of proenzymes. In addition, kinetic studies are suggestive of a slow unimolecular mechanism of autoactivation which is independent of proenzyme concentration. However, inspection of the recently determined x-ray crystal structures does not support this evidence. This is due primarily to the extensive distances between the catalytic thiolate-imidazolium ion pair and the putative site of proteolysis near the pro/mature junction required to form mature protein. Furthermore, the prosegments for this family of precursors have been shown to bind through the substrate binding clefts in a direction opposite to that expected for natural substrates. We report, using cystatin C- and N-terminal sequencing, the identification of autoproteolytic intermediates of processing in vitro for purified recombinant procathepsin B and procathepsin S. Inspection of the x-ray crystal structures reported to date indicates that these reactions occur within a segment of the proregion which binds through the substrate binding clefts of the enzymes, thus suggesting that these reactions are occurring as unimolecular processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".