MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973739751 · doi:10.7202/1002146ar

Les politiques de plein emploi appartiennent-elles au passé?

2011· article· fr· W1973739751 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pascal Petit

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de recherche sociologique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur fait ressortir le jeu des contraintes pesant sur les politiques de plein emploi depuis les années 1980. Partant de là, les champs nouveaux qui s’ouvrent aux « régulations politiques » sont identifiés. L’enjeu se découpe avec précision. Soit le blocage des politiques de plein emploi est « fatal », ce qui rend l’érosion des anciens compromis inévitables. Soit les marges laissées à une revitalisation des compromis en faveur de l’emploi permettent une restructuration du rapport salarial plus efficace et plus équitable. En tout état de cause, ce n’est qu’en tirant profit des évolutions structurelles du marché du travail qu’il sera possible d’intensifier et d’avoir une certaine maîtrise sur les processus d’ajustement présentement à l’oeuvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.459
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.016 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de recherche sociologiqueSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207