MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Radial Jet and Hydraulic Jump in a Circular Basin

2013· article· en· W1973742296 on OpenAlexaff
Hasan Zobeyer, N. Rajaratnam, David Z. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFroude numberHydraulic jumpJumpMechanicsSupercritical flowInviscid flowRADIUSInletMathematicsHydrostatic equilibriumCompressibilityJet (fluid)Flow (mathematics)GeometryGeologyPhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of the supercritical spreading of radial flow in a horizontal basin indicates that the variation of depth, velocity, and Froude number normalized by corresponding inlet values becomes independent of the inlet Froude number F0 when F0>5, both for inviscid and viscous flows. Assuming a linear variation of the hydrostatic pressure force along the hydraulic jump, a generalized equation for the sequent depth ratio is developed, which is valid for the free and submerged jumps both in radial and rectangular basins. This is simpler than existing equations and is verified with experimental data available in the literature. A new scale is proposed such that the sequent depth ratio for different F0 and the radius ratio collapse into a single line. A procedure to approximately locate the position of a free radial jump and determine the type of the jump is also described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering MechanicsSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207