MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973744650 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.036704

Multibox strategy for constructing highly accurate bound-state wave functions for three-body systems

2001· article· en· W1973744650 on OpenAlexaff
Alexei M. Frolov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWave functionBound stateExponential functionFunction (biology)PhysicsState (computer science)Basis (linear algebra)Nonlinear systemUpper and lower boundsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variational, multibox approach is proposed to construct extremely accurate, bound-state wave functions for arbitrary three-body systems. The high efficiency of our present approach is based on an optimal choice of nonlinear parameters in the exponential basis functions. The proposed method is very flexible, since the final wave function can also include a large number of separately optimized cluster fragments. The wave functions obtained are very compact and highly accurate. Such wave functions can be used to compute various bound state properties for different three-body systems. The proposed approach has been successfully tested on a large number of actual systems. It is shown that the present approach can be used to solve various three-body problems with, in principle, arbitrary precision. In particular, the long-standing problem of highly accurate determination of the weakly bound (1,1) states in the $\mathrm{dd}\ensuremath{\mu}$ and $\mathrm{dt}\ensuremath{\mu}$ muonic molecular ions has finally been solved. The determined binding energies are $\ensuremath{-}1.9749880880\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10} \mathrm{eV}$ and $\ensuremath{-}0.66033874\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8} \mathrm{eV},$ respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207