Role of Immunosuppressives in Special Situations: Perianal Disease and Postoperative Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex perianal disease is associated with poor outcome and requires early effective therapy. Corticosteroids are not effective in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, and antibiotics, immunosuppressants and anti-TNF therapy are required. It is important to consider combined medical surgical therapy after accurate imaging using an MRI scan of the pelvis. Drainage of any abscess at examination under anaesthesia and seton insertion are important before introduction of immunosuppressants and anti-TNF therapy. Long-term follow up of patients in a single centre reported responders to azathioprine having a reduced risk of perianal surgery (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.46), but complex perianal fistulising Crohn's disease generally requires combination therapy with anti-TNF and azathioprine. Patients with recent perianal disease without fistulae and aged 40 years or older respond better to azathioprine monotherapy. Response to monotherapy with azathioprine is often slow and incomplete. In the recent GETAID study of early administration of azathioprine versus conventional management in patients at high risk of disabling disease, a higher cumulative proportion of patients in the azathioprine group were free of perianal surgery. In patients not responding to anti-TNF therapy, thalidomide or tacrolimus may be considered. Hyperbaric oxygen may be used as adjunctive therapy where available. The role of adipose-derived stem cell injection requires further long-term studies. In prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine had a favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared with no prophylactic therapy up to 1 year. In a Cochrane systematic review, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical recurrence [RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38-0.92, number needed to treat (NNT) = 7] and severe endoscopic recurrence (RR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92, NNT = 4). Individual studies of prevention of post-operative recurrence using azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine have shown only modest benefit. In patients at high risk of relapse after surgical resection, anti-TNF therapy may be beneficial, but more data is required from ongoing studies. Strategies to prevent post-operative recurrence in Crohn's disease are evolving but need further refinement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".