Distributed Cohesive Motion Control of Quadrotor Vehicle Formations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on distributed cohesive motion control of 3-dimensional multi-vehicle systems considering individual agent dynamic behaviors as well as the overall multi-vehicle system. In this context, we examine maintenance of geometric formation of a swarm of autonomous quadrotor vehicles, i.e. maintenance of the distance between each agent pair in the swarm, during arbitrary maneuvers. A distributed scheme for the formation maintenance task is developed first. This coordination scheme is integrated with low level dynamic controllers designed for the agents considering practical kinematic and dynamic models for quadrotor vehicles. The distributed motion control scheme is implemented to move the vehicles whose initial positions satisfying the desired formation maintenance constraints are specified, to a set of final desired positions satisfying the same constraints cohesively without deviating from the desired geometric formation during motion. The developed coordination and control schemes are tested via a number of simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it