A Remarkable Ligand Orientational Effect in Osmium‐Atom‐Induced Blue Phosphorescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new series of Os(II)-based carbonyl complexes cis(CO),trans(Npy,Npy),cis(Ntz,Ntz)-[Os(CO)2(bptz)2] (1), cis(CO),cis(Npy,Npy),trans(Ntz,Ntz)-[Os(bptz)2(CO)2] (2), and cis(CO),trans(Npy,Npy),cis(Ntz,Ntz)-[Os(CO)2(fptz)2] (3), where bptz and fptz denote 3-tert-butyl-5-(2-pyridyl)- and 3-trifluoromethyl-5-(2-pyridyl)-1,2,4-triazolate, respectively, have been designed and synthesized in an effort to achieve high efficiency, room-temperature blue phosphorescence. Although 1 and 2 are geometric isomers, remarkably different excited-state relaxation pathways were observed. Complex 1 exhibits strong phosphorescence in CH3CN (Phi(p) approximately 0.47) and as a single crystal at room temperature, whereas complex 2 is nearly nonemissive under similar conditions. The associated relaxation dynamics have been comprehensively investigated by spectroscopic and relaxation dynamics as well as by theoretical approaches. Our results lead us to the conclusion that for complex 2, the "loose bolt" effect of metal-ligand bonding interactions plays a crucial role in the fast radiationless deactivation of this type of geometrical isomer. Fine adjustment can also be achieved by functionalizing the ligands so that the electron-withdrawing nature of the CF3 group in 3 stabilizes the HOMO of the triazolate moiety, thus moving the emission further into the pure "blue" region; this results in highly efficient phosphorescence and renders 3 particularly attractive for application in blue OLED devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".