Uterine Lymphangioma in Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uterine lymphangiomas are rare benign tumors of the lymphatic system that are commonly congenital. CASE: A 36-year-old woman was diagnosed with an asymptomatic cystic mass of unclear etiology before pregnancy. It was thought to be an adnexal mass and managed conservatively during the antepartum period with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Her pregnancy was otherwise uncomplicated. Postpartum she underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy that revealed that the cystic mass originated from the uterus. Hysterectomy histopathology revealed a vascular lesion consistent with a uterine lymphangioma. There were no adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with the presence of the uterine lymphangioma. CONCLUSION: Lack of adverse pregnancy outcomes in this case suggests the consideration of conservative management of uterine lymphangiomas during pregnancy. Surgical resection is usually necessary to confirm the diagnosis of lymphangioma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".