MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973804928 · doi:10.1196/annals.1317.033

PACAP Stimulates the Release of the Secretogranin II‐Derived Peptide EM66 from Chromaffin Cells

2006· article· en· W1973804928 on OpenAlexaff
Johann Guillemot, Djida Aït‐Ali, Valérie Turquier, Maïté Montero‐Hadjadje, Alain Fournier, Hubert Vaudry, Youssef Anouar, Laurent Yon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromaffin cellStimulationProtein kinase CAdrenal medullaChemistryEndocrinologyInternal medicineCell biologyPeptideSignal transductionBiologyBiochemistryMedicineCatecholamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present article was to examine the effect of PACAP on the release of the SgII-derived peptide EM66 from primary cultures of bovine chromaffin cells. PACAP dose dependently stimulated EM66 release from cultured chromaffin cells. A significant response was observed after 6 h of treatment with PACAP and increased to reach a 3.6-fold stimulation at 72 h. The stimulatory effect of PACAP was mediated through multiple signaling pathways, including calcium influx through L-type channels, PKA, PKC, and MAP-kinase cascades, to regulate EM66 release from chromaffin cells. These data suggest that EM66 may act downstream of the trans-synaptic stimulation of the adrenal medulla by neurocrine factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207