Bibliographic record
Abstract
SIMT accelerators are equipped with thousands of computational resources. Conventional accelerators, however, fail to fully utilize available resources due to branch and memory divergences. This underutilization is manifested in two underlying inefficiencies: pipeline width underutilization and pipeline depth underutilization. Width underutilization occurs when SIMD execution units are not entirely utilized due to branch divergences. This affects lane activity and results in SIMD inefficiency. Depth underutilization takes place when the pipeline runs out of active threads and is forced to leave pipeline stages idle. This work addresses both inefficiencies by harnessing inactive threads available to the pipeline. We introduce Harnessing inActive thReads in many-core Processors (or simply HARP) to improve width and depth utilization in accelerators. We show how using inactive yet ready threads can enhance performance. Moreover, we investigate implementation details and study microarchitectural changes needed to build a HARP-enhanced accelerator. Furthermore, we evaluate HARP under a variety of microarchitectural design points. We measure the area overhead associated with HARP and compare to conventional alternatives. Under Fermi-like GPUs, we show that HARP provides 10% speedup on average (maximum of 1.6X) at the cost of 3.5% area overhead. Our analysis shows that HARP performs better under narrower SIMD and shorter pipelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".