MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973809615 · doi:10.1115/ipc2002-27093

Pipeline Installation in a Confined Location Under the Bow River by Horizontal Directional Drilling

2002· article· en· W1973809615 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joe Zhou, Alan Glover, Paul Rudge

Bibliographic record

Venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectional drillingPipeline transportPipeline (software)UpgradeDrillingPopulationMarine engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2000, TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. (TransCanada) upgraded portions of the Western Alberta System (WAS) NPS 36 gas pipeline through the town of Cochrane Alberta. The pipeline upgrade required the installation of new sections of pipe to meet the higher Class Location designation due to population density increase. Environmental concerns, expressed by federal and provincial regulators and the Cochrane community for the in-stream disturbance associated with a conventional “open cutting” installation, prompted TransCanada to design a directionally drilled crossing. A unique challenge to this project was the Bow River crossing within a congested and restricted right of way. The project team developed and implemented a series of innovative solutions which led to the successful conclusion of the project in September 2000. This paper summarizes the unique design and construction implemented in this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and BSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207