MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973820175 · doi:10.1117/12.2005368

Narrow-linewidth three-electrode regrowth-free semiconductor DFB lasers with uniform surface grating

2013· article· en· W1973820175 on OpenAlexafffund
Kais Dridi, Abdessamad Benhsaien, Akram Akrout, Jessica Zhang, Trevor J. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCMC Microsystems (Canada)University of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsLaser linewidthMaterials scienceGratingSemiconductor laser theoryOptoelectronicsLaserDistributed feedback laserOpticsElectrodeSemiconductorDiffraction gratingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been much interest in developing low-cost laser sources for applications such as photonics integrated circuits and advanced coherent optical communications. The ultimate objectives in this development include wide wavelength tunability, a narrow linewidth, and an ease of integration with other devices. For this purpose, semiconductor surface grating distributed feedback (SG-DFB) lasers have been introduced. SG-DFB manufacturing consists of a unique sequence of planar epitaxial growth resulting in a major simplification to the fabrication process. SG-DFB lasers are highly monolithically integrate-able with other devices due to their small footprint. The segmentation of the built-in top electrode helps to alleviate the adverse spatial-hole burning effects encountered in single-electrode devices and brings hence significant enhancements to the laser performance. For the first time, we report here on the design, fabrication, and characterization of InGaAsP/InP multiple-quantum-well (MQW) SG-DFB lasers with uniform third-order surface grating etched by means of stepper lithography and inductively-coupled reactive-ion. The uncoated device reported here is 750 μm-long SG-DFB laser whose central and lateral top electrodes are 244 μmlongs each, separated by two 9 μm-long grooves. The experimental characterization shows stable single mode operation at room temperature under uniform and non-uniform injection. High side mode suppression ratios (SMSRs) (50-55dB) under a wide range of injection current have been discerned as well. A relatively broad wavelength tuning (<4nm) has also been observed. Moreover, a narrow linewidth (<300 kHz) has been recorded for different injection currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207