MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973826439 · doi:10.1002/pssb.201147393

Hybrid photovoltaic cells based on ZnO/Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>/P3HT heterojunctions

2011· article· en· W1973826439 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Ping Liu, Hong‐En Wang, Tsz‐Wai Ng, Zhenhua Chen, Wenfeng Zhang, Chang Yan, Yongbing Tang, I. Bello, L. Martinů, Wenjun Zhang, S. K. Jha

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsHeterojunctionMaterials scienceX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyAnnealing (glass)CrystallinityIndium tin oxideAntimonyIndiumOptoelectronicsZincOxideAbsorption (acoustics)Chemical engineeringThin filmNanotechnologyComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We demonstrate hybrid photovoltaic (PV) cells based on n–i–p heterojunctions with incorporated zinc oxide (ZnO) films using a sol–gel method. The cells, employing stibnite (Sb2S3), and poly(3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT) materials, as light absorption layers, constitute an active region in the indium tin oxide (ITO)/ZnO(n)/Sb2S3(i)/P3HT(p)/Ag hybrid structure. Our investigation shows that annealing temperature has a significant effect on both the crystallinity and optical absorption of Sb2S3 films. The near‐intrinsic Sb2S3 films annealed at 300 °C exhibits dark conductivity of 1.42 × 10−7 S cm−1. The performance of PV cells strongly depends on thermal treatment of Sb2S3, and on the thickness of both the Sb2S3 and P3HT layers. Electronic structures of annealed Sb2S3 films was further studied by photoelectron spectroscopy to understand the physics behind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207