Femmes européennes, terrains amérindiens : terra nullius de l’éthique ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article part du constat que les transformations, depuis les années 1960, des relations entre autochtones et chercheurs dans le monde nord-américain et la recherche anglophone, ainsi que leurs répercussions s’agissant de l’éthique, ne s’observent pas ou peu en Europe, plus précisément en France ou en suisse. Je pose la question des implications de ce « vide » (relatif) sur les pratiques des jeunes chercheurs menant des recherches avec/pour les peuples autochtones, à partir de mon cheminement en tant que femme française, réalisant une recherche ethnographique en terrain Dènè (dans le nord-ouest de la Saskatchewan). Enfin, au-delà des critiques de la bureaucratisation des relations autochtones-chercheurs, l’article cherche aussi a souligner d’autres dimensions de l’éthique, plus processuelles, et non écrites, qui gouvernent ces relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".