MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973856925 · doi:10.1049/joe.2014.0130

Dual band‐notched monopole antenna with enhanced bandwidth for ultra‐wideband wireless communications

2014· article· en· W1973856925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopole antennaMulti-band deviceMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaWi-FiAcousticsBandwidth (computing)Ground planeMaterials scienceWidebandElectrical engineeringAntenna (radio)OpticsWirelessPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new configuration of an ultra‐wideband (UWB) dual band‐notched antenna is presented. The designed geometry consists of octagonal radiating patch, a 50 Ω microstrip feed‐line on the front and an asymmetric partial ground on the back. For impedance bandwidth enhancement, a unilateral stepped structure is utilised on the ground. By etching two E‐shaped slots connected to each other on the radiating patch and applying E‐shaped defected ground structure on the back, dual notched bands are achieved. The antenna is printed on a low profile FR4 substrate with a compact size of 25 × 18 × 1 mm 3 . The experimental results indicate that the antenna has an impedance bandwidth from 2.55 to 21.65 GHz for voltage standing wave ratio ≤2, except the notched bands on worldwide interoperability for microwave access and wireless local area network bands. Moreover, stable radiation patterns and gains within the operating band are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it