Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le mythe de l’ancienneté des Frisons fait aujourd’hui partie de l’identité des populations régionales en Allemagne et, plus encore, aux Pays-Bas. Or leur conviction d’être héritières du groupe ethnique des Frisons qui aurait été parmi les plus anciens peuples germaniques a été mise en question ces quinze dernières années par des chercheurs néerlandais. L’hypothèse, communément admise pendant longtemps, recourait, avec pour principaux arguments, à l’ancienneté supposée du droit frison et de l’occupation du sol, remontant aux premiers siècles avant notre ère. L’esquisse présentée ici discute les témoignages archéologiques et historiographiques dans le cadre des recherches sur l’ethnogenèse pendant cette période de la transformation du monde antique. Sur la base d’une analyse linguistique, il est proposé une nouvelle chronologie de l’ethnogenèse et de la glottogenèse frisonnes à partir du vii e siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".