MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973859598 · doi:10.3917/rdn.391.0749

L'ethnogenèse des Frisons

2011· article· fr· W1973859598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du Nord · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsMcGill-Queen's University Press
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le mythe de l’ancienneté des Frisons fait aujourd’hui partie de l’identité des populations régionales en Allemagne et, plus encore, aux Pays-Bas. Or leur conviction d’être héritières du groupe ethnique des Frisons qui aurait été parmi les plus anciens peuples germaniques a été mise en question ces quinze dernières années par des chercheurs néerlandais. L’hypothèse, communément admise pendant longtemps, recourait, avec pour principaux arguments, à l’ancienneté supposée du droit frison et de l’occupation du sol, remontant aux premiers siècles avant notre ère. L’esquisse présentée ici discute les témoignages archéologiques et historiographiques dans le cadre des recherches sur l’ethnogenèse pendant cette période de la transformation du monde antique. Sur la base d’une analyse linguistique, il est proposé une nouvelle chronologie de l’ethnogenèse et de la glottogenèse frisonnes à partir du vii e siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it