MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973879095 · doi:10.1107/s0108767302092103

Low temperature transformations of ice

2002· article· en· W1973879095 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Klotz, F. Meducin, G. Hamel, J. S. Loveday, M. Guthrie, R. J. Nelmes

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title compound has the layered CdCl2 (C6)-type structure under normal pressure. On compression, phase transition was found to take place at 0.5 GPa with a volume contraction of 4 % (Bridgman, 1948), but the structure of the high pressure phase has remained undetermined. We made X-ray diffraction measurements using powdered samples squeezed in a diamond-anvil cell at a pressure of 0.9 GPa on a synchrotron radiation source at Photon Factory. In the pattern taken using the radiation 0.06195 nm in wavelength, closely spaced 36 diffraction lines have been recorded up to 1/2d = 2.55 nm -1 . They could be indexed in terms of an orthorhombic unit cell of the sizes of a = 0.8419, b = 1.190 and c = 8.751 nm, the longest axis being parallel to the c-axis of the original CdCl2-type structure. Analysis of the pattern on the basis of the intensities of the diffraction lines has led to the structure that can be interpreted as being formed by collapsing thirteen layers of the CdCl2-type structure in the c-axis direction. It is denser by 10 % than that of the normal pressure phase in agreement with the P-V relation determined by Bridgman (1948). Discussion is given on the structural feature of the high pressure phase and suggestion to the possible structure model of phase which form on further compression of the compound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207