MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973904960 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2008.5074762

Automatic blood cell classification based on joint histogram based feature and bhattacharya kernel

2008· article· en· W1973904960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistogramPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceSupport vector machineKernel (algebra)Computer scienceSegmentationJoint (building)Active contour modelFeature (linguistics)Feature extractionImage segmentationFeature vectorComputer visionMathematicsImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a blood cell classification method with the aim of designing an automatic differential blood count system, which can help cancer diagnosis. The proposed system contains two automated steps: an active contour-based segmentation of blood cells from microscopy images and their classification. For classification we investigate several joint histogram-based features extracted from the segmented blood cells. We use support vector machine with a proposed kernel based on the Bhattacharya coefficient of joint histograms. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our system. Furthermore, comparative study illustrates that the proposed system outperforms other existing classification approaches in terms of classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207