Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography for Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy in Central Corneal Stromal Scarring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) in planning phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) removal of central corneal stromal scarring. METHODS: A 62-year-old male presented with central corneal scars associated with significant ocular surface disease. Videokeratographies obtained using 3 different systems were not reliable. ASOCT, however, provided consistent pachymetry in the presence of noncalcific stromal opacity, which extended below Bowman membrane. PTK was performed with a transepithelial ablation, mitomycin C (MMC), and a slightly myopic photorefractive keratectomy. RESULTS: Slit-lamp examination and postoperative ASOCT revealed an optically clear cornea with no evidence of stromal haze at any time point. CONCLUSION: Transepithelial PTK guided by ASOCT can allow for the precise and accurate removal of central corneal stromal opacities, resulting in a favorable refractive outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it