MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973916863 · doi:10.1159/000328532

Cytologic Predictors of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women with an ASCUS Pap Smear

2000· article· en· W1973916863 on OpenAlexaff
Carol Morin, Isabelle Bairati, Céline Bouchard, Michel A. Fortier, Michel Roy, Lynne Moore, Alexander Meisels

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Cytologica · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscus (bryozoa)MedicineColposcopyCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaGynecologyCytologyBethesda systemAtypiaPopulationCytopathologyOdds ratioObstetricsBiopsyCervical cancerPathologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To identify cytologic parameters on Pap smears of women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) diagnosis that could help cytologists to indicate whether a particular ASCUS case is most likely related to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 or 2/3. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 360 eligible women diagnosed with ASCUS and referred to the colposcopy clinic of Saint-Sacrement Hospital participated in the study. Eligible women were those aged 18-50 years, newly diagnosed with ASCUS, with no history of cervical biopsies or treatment, and not pregnant at the time of the visit. Colposcopically directed biopsies of lesions were obtained. All Pap smears were reviewed according to 36 different cytomorphologic criteria. The regression logistic model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between cytologic criteria observed in smears and the diagnosis of CIN made on biopsies. All cytologic criteria significantly (P < .05) associated with CIN were entered in the models, and a backward selection was done to determine independent cytologic predictors of CIN 1 and 2/3. RESULTS: Biopsies revealed that 22.2% of the study population had concurrent CIN. CIN I and 2/3 were identified in 61 (16.9%) and 19 women (5.3%), respectively. Clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 2.5, P = .002) and moderate nuclear atypia (OR = 4.4, P = .02) were two cytologic criteria independently associated with CIN 1. Four independent predictors of CIN 2/3 were identified: the presence of clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 5.9, P = .004), hyperchromasia (OR = 3.9, P = .04), moderate anisokaryosis (OR = 13.1, P = .01 and increased nuclear volume of metaplastic cells (OR = 5.1, P = .007). CONCLUSION: These observations may help cytologists to better categorize ASCUS lesions as intraepithelial ones and will also contribute to improving the Bethesda definition of ASCUS. Further studies are planned to validate these observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa CytologicaSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207