MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SYNCHRONIZED TRIGONOMETRIC S-CURVE TRAJECTORY FOR JERK-BOUNDED TIME-OPTIMAL PICK AND PLACE OPERATION

2012· article· en· W1973919856 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. Saravana Perumaal, N. Jawahar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJerkBounded functionTrigonometryTrajectoryTrigonometric functionsMathematicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceGeometryPhysicsAccelerationClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Industrial robots are predominately used in point-to-point applica-tions such as machine loading and unloading and spot welding. Asmooth and time-optimal trajectory of robot is essential for precisehandling applications. Lot of jerk-limited motion profiles are pro-posed in the literature and are classified under two approaches. Inthe first approach, the motion profiles are generated using prede-fined intermediate points called knot or control points which arespecifiedbytheuserforitsinterpolation. S-curvemotionisanotherapproach for jerk-limited motion. This paper presents an approachto generate a new synchronized jerk-bounded trigonometric S-curvetrajectory for 6 DOF robotic manipulator that has the followingfeatures: acceleration and deceleration phases follow a sine waveform of jerk profile; each phase (acceleration, constant velocity anddeceleration) of motion of all the “n joints start and end at thesame time instant (synchronized motion of the “n joints). The re-sultsofnumericalillustrationsshowthatproposedtrajectoryabletogenerate synchronized, smooth trajectory with minimum executiontime and much lesser jerk values when compared with spline-basedtrajectorieswhicharefound in literatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207