MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973951307 · doi:10.1051/medsci/20031910981

Rôle de la réponse immunitaire innée dans le cerveau

2003· review· fr· W1973951307 on OpenAlexaff
Véronique Blais, Serge Rivest

Bibliographic record

Venuemédecine/sciences · 2003
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnate immune systemNeurodegenerationMicrogliaNeuroscienceBiologyInflammationCentral nervous systemImmune systemImmunityNervous systemImmunologyMedicineDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an innate immune system in the brain. It is inducible in a transient manner from the structures that are devoid of blood brain barrier and thereafter within parenchymal microglia during systemic infection. Transcriptional activation of genes encoding proteins of the innate immunity also takes place in diseases of the central nervous system. This recent discovery raised the hypothesis that inflammation and innate immunity may be involved in the etiology of neurodegenerative disorders. Nevertheless, this system is able to trigger the release of neurotrophic factors and to protect neuronal elements during brain infection and trauma. The innate immune response may play a critical role in protecting neurons and be a possible cause of neurodegeneration. The fate of this newly identified cascade of events is therefore likely to have a determinant impact on the central nervous system during infection and injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemédecine/sciencesSame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207