MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sertad1 Plays an Essential Role in Developmentaland Pathological Neuron Death

2010· article· en· W1973955422 on OpenAlexafffund
Subhas C. Biswas, Yi Zhang, Grace O. Iyirhiaro, Ryan T. Willett, Yasmilde Rodríguez González, Sean P. Cregan, Ruth S. Slack, David S. Park, Lloyd A. Greene

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Research Foundation of KoreaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Research FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsProgrammed cell deathGene knockdownBiologyNeuroscienceDownregulation and upregulationNeuronCell biologyActivator (genetics)Cyclin-dependent kinase 5NeurodegenerationApoptosisDNA damageNerve growth factorSmall hairpin RNAKinaseProtein kinase ADiseaseMedicineCyclin-dependent kinase 2GeneReceptorInternal medicineDNAGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developmental and pathological death of neurons requires activation of a defined pathway of cell cycle proteins. However, it is unclear how this pathway is regulated and whether it is relevant in vivo. A screen for transcripts robustly induced in cultured neurons by DNA damage identified Sertad1, a Cdk4 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4) activator. Sertad1 is also induced in neurons by nerve growth factor (NGF) deprivation and Abeta (beta-amyloid). RNA interference-mediated downregulation of Sertad1 protects neurons in all three death models. Studies of NGF withdrawal indicate that Sertad1 is required to initiate the apoptotic cell cycle pathway since its knockdown blocks subsequent pathway events. Finally, we find that Sertad1 expression is required for developmental neuronal death in the cerebral cortex. Sertad1 thus appears to be essential for neuron death in trophic support deprivation in vitro and in vivo and in models of DNA damage and Alzheimer's disease. It may therefore be a suitable target for therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207