MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1973956157 · doi:10.3103/s1066530714040024

Another look at bootstrapping the student t-statistic

2014· article· en· W1973956157 on OpenAlexafffund
Miklós Csörgő, Yu. V. Martsynyuk, Masoud M. Nasari

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods of Statistics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsBar (unit)StatisticsRandom variableBootstrapping (finance)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let X, X 1, X 2, ... be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with mean µ = EX. Let {v 1 () , ..., v () } =1 ∞ be vectors of nonnegative random variables (weights), independent of the data sequence {X 1, ..., X n } =1 ∞ , and put m n = Σ =1 v () . Consider v 1 () X 1, ..., v () X n , a bootstrap sample, resulting from re-sampling or stochastically re-weighing the random sample X 1, ..., X n , n ≥ 1. Put $$\bar X_n = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^n {X_i } /n$$ , the original sample mean, and define $$\bar X_{m_n }^* = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^n {v_i^{(n)} X_i /m_n }$$ , where m n := Σ =1 v () , the bootstrap sample mean. Thus, $$\bar X_{m_n }^* - \bar X_n = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {v_i^{(n)} /m_n - 1/n} \right)X_i }$$ . Put V 2 = Σ =1 (v () /m n − 1/n)2 and let S 2 , $$S_{m_n }^{*2}$$ respectively be the original sample variance and the bootstrap sample variance. The main aim of this exposition is to study the asymptotic behavior of the bootstrapped t-statistics $$T_{m_n }^* : = (\bar X_{m_n }^* - \bar X_n )/(S_n V_n )$$ and $$T_{m_n }^{**} : = \sqrt {m_n } (\bar X_{m_n }^* - \bar X_n )/S_{m_n }^*$$ in terms of conditioning on the weights via assuming that, as n → ∞, max1≤i≤n (v () /m n − 1/n)2/V 2 = o(1) almost surely or in probability on the probability space of the weights. In consequence of these maximum negligibility conditions on the weights, a characterization of the validity of this approach to the bootstrap is obtained as a direct consequence of the Lindeberg-Feller central limit theorem (CLT). This view of justifying the validity of bootstrapping i.i.d. observables is believed to be new. The need for it arises naturally in practice when exploring the nature of information contained in a random sample via re-sampling, for example. Conditioning on the data is also revisited for Efron’s bootstrap weights under conditions on n, m n as n → ∞ that differ from requiring m n /n to be in the interval [λ 1, λ 2] with 0 < λ 1 < λ 2 < ∞ as in Mason and Shao (2001). The validity of the bootstrapped t-intervals is established for both approaches to conditioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods of StatisticsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207