Expression of connexin48.5, connexin44.1, and connexin43 during zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) lens development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connexins (Cx), the protein units of gap junctions, play important roles in lens development and homeostasis. Here, we report the mRNA expression patterns of zebrafish Cx48.5, Cx44.1, Cx43 during lens development. The expression of all three connexins in the adult lens was first confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. By whole-mount in situ hybridization, we detected Cx48.5 expression throughout the lens, except the lateral lens epithelium, at 36 hours postfertilization (hpf). The pattern remained the same at 2 days postfertilization (dpf). By 3 and 4 dpf, Cx48.5 expression was restricted to the differentiating lens fibers in the equatorial and medial regions. Cx44.1 was expressed in a similar manner as Cx48.5 from 36 hpf to 4 dpf. However, Cx44.1 expression was also detected in the lens at 24 hpf. Cx43 expression was detected throughout the lens at 24 and 36 hpf but became restricted to the lateral epithelium at later stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".