MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endothelin‐1‐endothelin receptor type A mediates closure of rat ductus arteriosus at birth

2001· article· en· W1974002158 on OpenAlexaff
Takanobu Taniguchi, Hiroshi Azuma, Yuichi Okada, Hironobu Naiki, Morley D. Hollenberg, Ikunobu Muramatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuctus arteriosusAntagonistEndocrinologyInternal medicineContraction (grammar)Endothelin 1Endothelin receptorIn vivoAgonistUterine contractionReceptor antagonistReceptorChemistryConstrictionBiologyMedicineUterus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. The ductus arteriosus (DA) undergoes rapid closure after birth as pulmonary circulation is established. The involvement of endothelin-1 (ET1) in this closure mechanism is controversial. 2. The effect of ATZ1993 (ATZ), a non-peptide antagonist for the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, on postnatal closure and O2-induced contraction of the rat DA was investigated both in vivo and in vitro. Rat pups were delivered by Caesarean section and were given ATZ intraperitoneally. The minimum external DA diameter and the extent of DA constriction in vivo were evaluated at 2.5 h after birth. ATZ caused a dose-dependent inhibition of DA closure in vivo. When rat pups were given ATZ at 2.5 h after birth, re-opening of the DA was observed. 3. In vitro, ATZ also caused a marked inhibition of O2-induced and ET1-induced DA contractions as did BQ123, an ET(A)-specific antagonist. In contrast, sarafotoxin S6c, an ET(B)-specific agonist, did not cause DA contraction and BQ788, an ET(B)-specific antagonist, did not affect O2-induced DA contraction. 4. In conclusion, ET1 and its cognate receptor ET(A) may play a physiological role in the postnatal closure of the rat DA in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207