In Situ XRD and Electrochemical Study of the Reaction of Lithium with Amorphous Silicon
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.003
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.289
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Silicon is a very promising candidate to replace graphite as the anode in Li-ion batteries because of its very high theoretical capacity. It has not yet made its way into commercial cells because of severe problems with the charge and discharge cycling of the material. It seems that amorphous silicon and amorphous silicon-containing alloys exhibit much improved cycling performance. Therefore, it is desirable to fully understand the reaction of Li with a-Si. To this end, an in situ X-ray diffraction study of the reaction of lithium with a-Si has been performed. The results confirm that a new crystalline phase is formed below 30 mV vs. as first reported by Obrovac and Christensen in an article published in Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. However, the crystalline phase only forms for films of a-Si above a critical thickness of about 2 μm. © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Topic
- Advancements in Battery Materials
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- Dalhousie University
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Keywords
- SiliconAmorphous solidElectrochemistryMaterials scienceAnodeLithium (medication)Amorphous siliconGraphiteChemical engineeringCrystalline siliconPhase (matter)NanotechnologyElectrodeMetallurgyCrystallographyChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes