MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Blood Pump Speed, Recirculation, and Urea Clearance in Hemodialysis Patients with Dysfunctional Catheters

2003· article· en· W1974021744 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rachel C. Carson, Jennifer M. MacRae, Mercedeh Kiaii

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterHemodialysisUreaArterial lineDialysisHemodialysis CatheterSurgeryAnesthesiaUrologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urea clearance varies with dialysis blood pump speed (Qb) for well-functioning hemodialysis (HD) catheters. Patients with dysfunctional HD catheters often have reduced Qb due to catheter thrombosis, fibrin sheath, or central venous stenosis. One method of achieving higher Qb is to reverse the position of the HD lines (i.e., connect the arterial line to the venous port and vice versa). However, line reversal is associated with greater catheter access recirculation (AR) and resultant decreased urea clearance. Objective : To determine the effect of line reversal with varying Qb on % AR, and urea clearance in HD patients with dysfunctional. Methods : 7 patients with dysfunctional internal jugular catheters in our HD unit were identified. During a regularly scheduled HD session, we measured each patient's on-line urea clearance using dialysance (Diascan) at the maximum achievable Qb with the lines in the normal position, and at varying Qb with the lines in reversed position. With lines in the reversed position at Qb of 200, 300 and 400 ml/min, dialysance was 123, 159, and 195 ml/min respectively (figure).Conclusions: Line reversal is associated with significant AR in patients with dysfunctional catheters. However, in patients with dysfunctional HD catheters in whom the maximum achievable Qb is ≤ 200 ml/min in the normal position, greater urea clearance can be achieved by line reversal and increasing Qb to ≥ 300 ml/min. Dialysance was used as a surrogate measurement of urea clearance. AR was also measured using ultrasound dilution technique. (Transonic machine) Linear regression was used to model the relationships between Qb, dialysance and AR. Results: AR in dysfunctional IJ catheters with lines in the normal position was 0% for all Qb in the range 150–400 ml/min. According to the regression model, AR with lines in the reverse position was 19% at Qb 300 ml/min. Maximum achievable dialysance with lines in the normal position for Qb ≤ 200 ml/min was 144 ml/min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→