MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974054205 · doi:10.1364/jocn.4.000997

Performance Evaluation of an Optical Burst Switched Core Node With Generalized Arrivals and Partial Wavelength Conversion Capability

2012· article· en· W1974054205 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Morsy-Osman, Mohammed Y. S. Sowailem, Ahmed I. Abd El-Rahman, Hossam M. H. Shalaby

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical burst switchingNode (physics)Poisson distributionComputer scienceMarkov chainQueueRange (aeronautics)Topology (electrical circuits)Real-time computingWavelength-division multiplexingWavelengthComputer networkMathematicsPhysicsStatisticsEngineeringOptical performance monitoringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the burst assembly algorithms employed in optical burst switching (OBS) networks preserve the IP traffic self-similarity property in the burst traffic. We introduce a mathematical model for performance evaluation of an OBS core node employing either no, a partial or a full wavelength conversion strategy. The model assumes long-range dependent (LRD) traffic arrivals to the OBS intermediate node whose inter-arrival times are accurately modeled by a Pareto distribution, whereas exponential holding times are assumed. In our proposed model, each output port in the node is modeled as a GI/M/w/w queue with partial server accessibility. An imbedded Markov chain approach is used to derive the limiting state probability distribution for the number of bursts currently served by an output port as seen by arriving bursts. Next, the average burst loss probability is evaluated from steady-state occupancy probabilities. In addition, the results of our mathematical model are validated via simulation. Furthermore, the results of the model are compared with those when assuming short-range dependent Poisson arrivals. Comparison shows that traditional Poisson traffic models yield over-optimistic performance measures compared to the LRD Pareto traffic models, especially for light traffic scenarios. Furthermore, we study the impact of varying different traffic parameters, such as the average arrival rate and the Hurst parameter, on the burst loss probability. Finally, the impact of varying the wavelength conversion capability on the burst loss probability is studied, where we compare two strategies for contention resolution: adding new channels (wavelengths) or adding wavelength converters, while taking the cost into consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it