MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197406440

Physical and behavioral development of nursing harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) pups in Maine

2006· article· en· W197406440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhocaHarbor sealSeal (emblem)MedicineGerontologyPsychologyGeographyFisheryArchaeologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compared to other phocids seals, the maternal investment strategy of the small bodied female harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) is complex. Females are unable to fast for the entire duration of pup rearing and are therefore reliant on resources in the vicinity of the pupping aggregation to continue provisioning their pup by mid-lactation. At the same time, harbor seal pups are highly active during lactation which increases energetic costs to the female but also offers an opportunity for females to influence the behavioral development of her pup. To understand how females maximize their pup's survival it is important to examine both the physical and behavioral development of harbor seal pups. The goal of my research was to describe the morphological development and ontogeny of diving behavioral for harbor seal pups in Maine in respect to the potential factors influencing these two measures of maternal investment. I conducted my research at pupping sites in the vicinity of Stonington, Maine. During two seasons, 156 pups were captured, weighed and measured, and equipped with identification tags. Birth dates were estimated for all individuals and a subset of animals received VHF radio transmitters and time-depth recorders (TDRs) in order to monitor movements, activity, and diving behavior. Pups were monitored using telemetry and were recaptured opportunistically to recover TDRs and measure growth. There was no difference in the timing o births between years and the mean pupping date was found to be May 23rd (SE = 0.5). Mean birth mass was 11.1 kg (SE = 0.23) and mass gain rate averaged 0.45 kg/d (SE = 0.03). Pup mass gains were found to differ between years and decline late in the pupping season. Additionally, pup mass gain rates were found to be positively associated with increased 'in water' activity after controlling for temporal. Data from TDRs revealed that pups spent a large portion of time in water (61%) during lactation and dove up to 100 m near weaning. Activity and diving behavior was found to be influenced by pup birth mass, mass gain rate, age as well as the depth available and tide heights experienced by pups during TDR deployment. Maximal dive duration and dive depths were highly associated with bathymetry and this factor was the most important in limiting pup diving depths early in lactation. The positive association between pup mass gain rate and activity is likely explained by the intermediary effects of female size and condition on both female attendance and pup growth. Although the lower mean mass gain rates in Maine compared to Canadian populations may be explained by differences in population status, this did not explain the lower range of values observed in this study. Resource limitations in the vicinity of pupping sites may provide an explanation for lower pup development and the significant decline in mass gain rates late in the pupping period in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it