MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974098774 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr:20070035

Wavelet-based image denoising with the normal inverse Gaussian prior and linear MMSE estimator

2008· article· en· W1974098774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsMinimum mean square errorWaveletEstimatorAdditive white Gaussian noiseNoise reductionAlgorithmGaussian noiseMean squared errorGaussianPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceWhite noiseStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new spatially adaptive wavelet-based method is introduced for reducing noise in images corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise. It is shown that a symmetric normal inverse Gaussian distribution is highly suitable for modelling the wavelet coefficients. In order to estimate the parameters of the distribution, a maximum-likelihood-based technique is proposed, wherein the Gauss–Hermite quadrature approximation is exploited to perform the maximisation in a computationally efficient way. A Bayesian minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) estimator is developed utilising the proposed distribution. The variances corresponding to the noise-free coefficients are obtained from the Bayesian estimates using a local neighbourhood. A modified linear MMSE estimator that incorporates both intra-scale and inter-scale dependencies is proposed. The performance of the proposed method is studied using typical noise-free images corrupted with simulated noise and compared with that of the other state-of-the-art methods. It is shown that the proposed method gives higher values of the peak signal-to-noise ratio compared with most of the other denoising techniques and provides images of good visual quality. Also, the performance of the proposed method is quite close to that of the state-of-the-art Gaussian scale mixture (GSM) method, but with much less complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it