MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974098774 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr:20070035

Wavelet-based image denoising with the normal inverse Gaussian prior and linear MMSE estimator

2008· article· en· W1974098774 on OpenAlexafffund
M. I. H. Bhuiyan, M. Omair Ahmad, M. N. S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsMinimum mean square errorWaveletEstimatorAdditive white Gaussian noiseNoise reductionAlgorithmGaussian noiseMean squared errorGaussianPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceWhite noiseStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new spatially adaptive wavelet-based method is introduced for reducing noise in images corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise. It is shown that a symmetric normal inverse Gaussian distribution is highly suitable for modelling the wavelet coefficients. In order to estimate the parameters of the distribution, a maximum-likelihood-based technique is proposed, wherein the Gauss–Hermite quadrature approximation is exploited to perform the maximisation in a computationally efficient way. A Bayesian minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) estimator is developed utilising the proposed distribution. The variances corresponding to the noise-free coefficients are obtained from the Bayesian estimates using a local neighbourhood. A modified linear MMSE estimator that incorporates both intra-scale and inter-scale dependencies is proposed. The performance of the proposed method is studied using typical noise-free images corrupted with simulated noise and compared with that of the other state-of-the-art methods. It is shown that the proposed method gives higher values of the peak signal-to-noise ratio compared with most of the other denoising techniques and provides images of good visual quality. Also, the performance of the proposed method is quite close to that of the state-of-the-art Gaussian scale mixture (GSM) method, but with much less complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Image ProcessingSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207