MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974123630 · doi:10.1504/ijise.2013.052606

Scheduling identical parallel machine with unequal job release time to minimise total flow time

2013· article· en· W1974123630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationScheduling (production processes)Flow shop schedulingScheduleJob shop schedulingHeuristicAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the identical parallel machine scheduling problem with unequal jobs release date to minimise the total flow time. An efficient heuristic algorithm was proposed, known as modified forward heuristic algorithm. The algorithm starts with developing a priority list of all jobs. This list is used to develop sub-schedules for each machine based on some propositions related to the jobs processing and release times with allowing delay schedule. A mathematical model of the problem was also developed. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by comparing its solutions with the optimal solutions of small test cases obtained from the developed mathematical model. Then, the results of large problems were compared with the results of the best reported heuristics in the literature. In addition to the simplicity of the proposed algorithm, these comparisons showed that the proposed algorithm can obtain solutions that are very close to the optimum solutions and better than the other heuristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it