One‐to‐one Midwifery: Restoring the “with Woman” Relationship in Midwifery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One-to-One Midwifery, a model of care developed in the United Kingdom, provides a continuous and personal relationship between each woman and her midwife. The organization of care and the outcomes are relevant to midwifery policy in all industrialized countries. One-to-One Midwifery is not solo practice. An important principle of the organization of the practice is to enable individual midwives to take time off and to provide supportive structures for the midwives. Here the implications of One-to-One Midwifery for childbearing women and their families, and the midwives involved, are explored. The One-to-One Midwifery model has particular relevance for Canada because it is very similar to the model of practice being developed in at least two provinces. It may also be of importance in the United States, particularly for midwives working shifts in hospitals who may want to develop a system that allows them to provide continuity to the women they serve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".