MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974161283 · doi:10.1002/polb.21725

Effect of PVDF characteristics on extruded film morphology and porous membranes feasibility by stretching

2009· article· en· W1974161283 on OpenAlexafffund
F. Sadeghi, Seyed H. Tabatabaei, Abdellah Ajji, Pierre J. Carreau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMembraneExtrusionCrystallizationFourier transform infrared spectroscopyLamellar structurePolyvinylidene fluorideUltimate tensile strengthComposite materialPolymerCrystallinityChemical engineeringPorosityPolymer chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three different polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) resins were selected to develop porous membranes through melt extrusion and stretching. The effect of the polymer rheology on chain elongation in the melt state was studied. The possibility of generating a row‐nucleated lamellar crystallization for precursor films was investigated. The arrangement and orientation of the crystalline phase were examined by wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The extrusion conditions and the blend compositions were adjusted to obtain uniform precursor films with appropriate morphology. Annealing, cold and hot stretching were consequently employed to generate and enlarge the pores. It was found that a proper crystalline structure of the precursor films was strongly dependent on molecular weight of PVDF and process conditions. Blending of two PVDF resins having low and high molecular weights improved the water vapor permeability of the obtained membranes. The tensile response was monitored during the stretching process for membrane development and the results revealed a distinct behavior for the membranes having low or high permeability. The membranes with low permeability did not show any significant strain hardening during stretching whereas for highly permeable membranes, a noticeable strain hardening behavior was observed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 1219–1229, 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207