MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974166089 · doi:10.1021/ja0430954

Mercaptopropyl-Modified Mesoporous Silica:  A Remarkable Support for the Preparation of a Reusable, Heterogeneous Palladium Catalyst for Coupling Reactions

2005· article· en· W1974166089 on OpenAlexaff
Cathleen M. Crudden, Mutyala Sateesh, Roxanne Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCatalysisLeaching (pedology)ScavengerPalladiumMesoporous silicaSurface modificationCoupling reactionMesoporous materialHeterogeneous catalysisFiltration (mathematics)Aqueous solutionHeck reactionInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryRadicalPhysical chemistrySoil water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The functionalization of SBA-15 with mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane leads to a material capable of absorbing Pd from organic and aqueous solutions. The resulting Pd-loaded material acts as a catalyst for the Suzuki-Miyaura and Mizoroki-Heck coupling reactions. Leaching studies show that the filtrate contains as little as 3 ppb Pd after reaction. Aminopropylated silica is an effective scavenger, and catalyst for the Mizoroki-Heck reaction, but leaching is significant (35 ppm), illustrating the importance of the thiol ligand to retain Pd on the surface. Heterogeneity tests such as hot filtration experiments and three-phase tests show that the reaction is occurring predominantly via surface-bound Pd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations524
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207