MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974169236 · doi:10.1039/c4cc03256j

The synthesis and structure of [Zn(TEMPO)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub> and [Zn(μ-H)(μ<sup>2</sup>-η<sup>1</sup>:η<sup>1</sup>-TEMPO)]<sub>6</sub>

2014· article· en· W1974169236 on OpenAlexaff
Phillip Jochmann, Douglas W. Stephan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyYield (engineering)HomolepticZincAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The commercially available radical TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yloxy) reacts with [ZnCp*2] (1) to yield the homoleptic compound [Zn(TEMPO)2]2 (2) through coupling of two Cp* radicals. Compound 1 reacts with H2 to afford the hydride complex [Zn(μ-H)(μ(2)-η(1)-η(1)-TEMPO)]6 (3) featuring a planar Zn6H6 ring in the solid state. Preliminary data suggest that the formation of 3 proceeds via a radical mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207