MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974176661 · doi:10.1139/p08-144

Electric field emission of electrons from spherical metallic dust particles

2009· article· en· W1974176661 on OpenAlex
M. S. Sodha, Amrit Dixit, Sujeet Kumar Agarwal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectronQuantum tunnellingField electron emissionElectric fieldBrillouin zoneParticle (ecology)Field (mathematics)Atomic physicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an almost exact expression for the tunneling probability of an electron through the potential barrier on account of a negative charge on a spherical metallic particle has been derived and used to obtain the field emission current density from the surface of the particle. Based on these results a parametric analysis of the phenomenon and comparison with the results of the Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (JWKB) approximation (similar to the Fowler–Nordheim theory) has been presented. It is seen that the JWKB theory underestimates the tunneling probability. The investigation is of relevance to dusty plasmas in space and in the laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it