MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1974211481 · doi:10.1386/srsc.2.3.269_1

Visual language and identity performance in Leonid Osyka's <i>A Stone Cross</i> : The roots and the uprooting

2008· article· en· W1974211481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vitaly Chernetsky

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Russian and Soviet Cinema · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianPeasantEmigrationPoetrySeveranceMovie theaterTheme (computing)Style (visual arts)Identity (music)LiteratureHistoryArtVisual artsSociologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLinguisticsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis article focuses on A Stone Cross (Kaminnyi khrest), a 1968 film by the Ukrainian director Leonid Osyka based on the work of the Ukrainian modernist writer Vasyl' Stefanyk, including the eponymous short story. While this film is regarded in the countries of the former Soviet bloc as one of the highest accomplishments of the poetic cinema movement of the 1960s and early 1970s, it has so far received little attention in the West. The present article examines the film-maker's choices made in adapting the literary texts, and especially the film's visual language, including its choice of setting, camerawork, editorial style and use of professional and non-professional actors, and the way these choices contribute to the work's overall dramatic impact. A key theme in this film, which narrates a peasant family's decision to emigrate to Canada in the late 1890s and the severance of its symbolic ties with the traditional rural community, is the deep identity crisis precipitated by the social upheavals o...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Russian and Soviet CinemaSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207