Behaviour and fate of tetracycline in river and wetland waters on the Canadian Northern Great Plains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Very little is known about the factors affecting the behaviour, degradation and persistence of tetracycline in sensitive Prairie freshwater aquatic systems in Canada. Reported are results of studies conducted for the first time of tetracycline behaviour in Prairie river and wetland waters. For comparison, studies were also conducted using distilled water as a control. Different amounts of spiked tetracycline (0, 50 and 80 percent) was adsorbed by distilled, river and wetland water, respectively. These different amounts are likely due to the differences in the matrixes of the three waters. In wetland water, the addition of EDTA generally promoted the release of tetracycline indicating that a portion of the tetracycline was bound to metal ions. Decreasing the pH of the wetland water led to increased adsorption of tetracycline suggesting either that tetracycline epimerizes or binds, by hydrogen bonding, to acidic portions of organic material in the water. However, in wetland water, a significant portion of the spiked tetracycline (approximately =50%) was irreversibly bound to the water matrix and was not released by adding EDTA and/or by varying the pH. In laboratory experiments, the t1/2 of "free-form" tetracycline exposed to light (L+) in non-sterile waters was 32, 2 and 3 days in distilled, river and wetland water respectively, while in waters with no light exposure (L-), they were 83, 18 and 13 days. Similarly, t1/2 of tetracycline in L+ sterile waters treatments was 9, 1 and 1 day for distilled, river and wetland water, respectively, and 18, 11 and 7 days in the L-. In the experiment conducted in natural sunlight, tetracycline t1/2 in the presence of ultraviolet radiation (UV) treatments was 26, 17 and 18 min in distilled, river and wetland water and 39, 28 and 32 min in the absence of UV treatment. The combination of the effects of matrixes of the water, light and UV radiation therefore play a significant role in catalyzing the removal of tetracycline from different Prairie waters. In deep waters and in systems where sunlight is highly attenuated, the effects of light on tetracycline may be considerably reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".